Land Rover Freelander 2012 vs Jeep Compass 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.1 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 420 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Freelander is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Freelander engine produces 27 HP more power than Jeep Compass, whereas torque is 100 NM more than Jeep Compass. Thanks to more power Land Rover Freelander reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 | 6.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.9 l/100km | 8.4 l/100km | |
|
The Jeep Compass is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Land Rover Freelander consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Compass, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Freelander could require 60 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Freelander consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Compass. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 51 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 970 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 1190 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
| 760 km with real consumption | 600 km with real consumption | ||
| Land Rover Freelander gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 560'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Freelander engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Jaguar XF, Land Rover Discovery Sport | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Freelander might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Land Rover Freelander 2012 2.2 engine: This engine is recognized for its reliability, power, and relatively low fuel consumption, as well as its durability in demanding conditions without frequent failures. However, it is sensitible to oil quality ... More about Land Rover Freelander 2012 2.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.47 m | |
| Width: | 1.91 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.66 m | |
|
Land Rover Freelander is larger. Land Rover Freelander is 4 cm longer than the Jeep Compass, 10 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Freelander is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 405 litres | 458 litres | |
|
Jeep Compass has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Land Rover Freelander has 53 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Compass. This could mean that the Land Rover Freelander uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`505 | 2`075 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 9600 | 7800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Freelander has
|
Jeep Compass has
| |