Land Rover Freelander 2012 vs Ford Kuga 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 420 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Freelander is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Freelander engine produces 27 HP more power than Ford Kuga, whereas torque is 80 NM more than Ford Kuga. Thanks to more power Land Rover Freelander reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 | 5.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.9 l/100km | 7.5 l/100km | |
|
The Ford Kuga is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Land Rover Freelander consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Kuga, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Freelander could require 165 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Freelander consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Kuga. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 970 km in combined cycle | 1010 km in combined cycle | |
| 1190 km on highway | 1170 km on highway | ||
| 760 km with real consumption | 800 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Land Rover Freelander 2012 2.2 engine: This engine is recognized for its reliability, power, and relatively low fuel consumption, as well as its durability in demanding conditions without frequent failures. However, it is sensitible to oil quality ... More about Land Rover Freelander 2012 2.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.91 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.70 m | |
| Land Rover Freelander is 2 cm shorter than the Ford Kuga, 7 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Freelander is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 405 litres | 456 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1568 litres | |
|
Ford Kuga has more luggage space. Land Rover Freelander has 51 litres less trunk space than the Ford Kuga. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Freelander is 0.3 metres more than that of the Ford Kuga. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`505 | 2`250 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 9600 | 11 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Freelander has
|
Ford Kuga has
| |