Land Rover Freelander 2012 vs Ford Escape 2008
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.3 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Land Rover Freelander) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Ford Escape) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 145 HP | |
| Torque: | 420 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Land Rover Freelander engine produces 45 HP more power than Ford Escape, whereas torque is 220 NM more than Ford Escape. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 | 10.5 | |
|
The Land Rover Freelander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Freelander consumes 3.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Escape, which means that by driving the Land Rover Freelander over 15,000 km in a year you can save 525 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 61 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 970 km in combined cycle | 580 km in combined cycle | |
| Land Rover Freelander gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Land Rover Freelander 2012 2.2 engine: This engine is recognized for its reliability, power, and relatively low fuel consumption, as well as its durability in demanding conditions without frequent failures. However, it is sensitible to oil quality ... More about Land Rover Freelander 2012 2.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.91 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.73 m | |
|
Land Rover Freelander is larger. Land Rover Freelander is 2 cm longer than the Ford Escape, 7 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Freelander is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 405 litres | 934 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1792 litres | |
|
Ford Escape has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Land Rover Freelander uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Freelander is 0.5 metres more than that of the Ford Escape, which means Land Rover Freelander can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`505 kg | 1`986 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`805 kg | 1`605 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 700 kg | 381 kg | |
| Land Rover Freelander load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 46 procentiem more than Ford Escape. Therefore, Land Rover Freelander is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 7600 | 6800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Freelander has
|
Ford Escape has
| |