Land Rover Freelander 2012 vs BMW X1 2009

 
Land Rover Freelander
2012 - 2014
BMW X1
2009 - 2012
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.2 Diesel2.0 Diesel
Camshaft drive: Timing chain and beltTiming chain

Performance

Power: 190 HP177 HP
Torque: 420 NM350 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.5 seconds8.3 seconds
Land Rover Freelander engine produces 13 HP more power than BMW X1, whereas torque is 70 NM more than BMW X1. Despite the higher power, Land Rover Freelander reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.05.9
Real fuel consumption: 8.9 l/100km7.5 l/100km
The BMW X1 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Land Rover Freelander consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X1, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Freelander could require 165 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Freelander consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X1.
Fuel tank capacity: 68 litres61 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 970 km in combined cycle1030 km in combined cycle
1190 km on highway1170 km on highway
760 km with real consumption810 km with real consumption

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Rear wheel drive (RWD)

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 560'000 km350'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Freelander engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 10 years17 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Jaguar XF, Land Rover Range Rover EvoqueInstalled on at least 6 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW 1 sērija, BMW X3
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW X1 might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.50 m4.45 m
Width: 1.91 m1.80 m
Height: 1.74 m1.55 m
Land Rover Freelander is larger.
Land Rover Freelander is 5 cm longer than the BMW X1, 11 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Freelander is 20 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 405 litres420 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1350 litres
Despite its longer length, Land Rover Freelander has 15 litres less trunk space than the BMW X1. This could mean that the Land Rover Freelander uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable.
Turning diameter: 11.3 meters11.8 meters
The turning circle of the Land Rover Freelander is 0.5 metres less than that of the BMW X1, which means Land Rover Freelander can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`5052`060
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
high
Average price (€): 10 8009000
Pros and Cons: Land Rover Freelander has
  • more power
  • has 4x4 drive
  • longer expected engine lifespan
BMW X1 has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv