Land Rover Freelander 2012 vs BMW X1 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 420 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | 8.3 seconds | |
| Land Rover Freelander engine produces 27 HP more power than BMW X1, whereas torque is 40 NM more than BMW X1. Despite the higher power, Land Rover Freelander reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 | 4.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.9 l/100km | 6.0 l/100km | |
|
The BMW X1 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Land Rover Freelander consumes 2.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X1, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Freelander could require 375 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Freelander consumes 2.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X1. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 61 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 970 km in combined cycle | 1350 km in combined cycle | |
| 1190 km on highway | 1480 km on highway | ||
| 760 km with real consumption | 1010 km with real consumption | ||
| BMW X1 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.91 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.55 m | |
|
Land Rover Freelander is larger. Land Rover Freelander is 2 cm longer than the BMW X1, 11 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Freelander is 20 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 405 litres | 420 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1350 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Land Rover Freelander has 15 litres less trunk space than the BMW X1. This could mean that the Land Rover Freelander uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Freelander is 0.5 metres less than that of the BMW X1, which means Land Rover Freelander can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`505 | 2`045 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 10 800 | 11 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Freelander has
|
BMW X1 has
| |