Land Rover Freelander 2012 vs Jeep Compass 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 240 HP | 156 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Freelander is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Freelander engine produces 84 HP more power than Jeep Compass, whereas torque is 150 NM more than Jeep Compass. Thanks to more power Land Rover Freelander reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.6 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 51 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.47 m | |
| Width: | 1.91 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.66 m | |
|
Land Rover Freelander is larger. Land Rover Freelander is 4 cm longer than the Jeep Compass, 10 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Freelander is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 405 litres | 458 litres | |
|
Jeep Compass has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Land Rover Freelander has 53 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Compass. This could mean that the Land Rover Freelander uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`505 | 2`010 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 10 800 | 8200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Freelander has
|
Jeep Compass has
| |