Land Rover Freelander 2012 vs Jaguar E-Pace 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 420 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
| Land Rover Freelander and Jaguar E-Pace have the same engine power, but Land Rover Freelander torque is 40 NM more than Jaguar E-Pace. Land Rover Freelander reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 | 5.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.6 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km | |
|
The Jaguar E-Pace is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Land Rover Freelander consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar E-Pace, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Freelander could require 210 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Freelander consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar E-Pace. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 970 km in combined cycle | 980 km in combined cycle | |
| 1170 km on highway | 1070 km on highway | ||
| 790 km with real consumption | 770 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 560'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Freelander engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Jaguar XF, Land Rover Discovery Sport | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Jaguar XF, Land Rover Discovery Sport, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, Jaguar XE | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jaguar E-Pace might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Land Rover Freelander 2012 2.2 engine: This engine is recognized for its reliability, power, and relatively low fuel consumption, as well as its durability in demanding conditions without frequent failures. However, it is sensitible to oil quality ... More about Land Rover Freelander 2012 2.2 engine Jaguar E-Pace 2017 2.0 engine: This engine is known for its relatively limited lifespan. In early production models, balance shaft bearings wore out quickly and started making noise. The chain-driven timing system, located on the flywheel ... More about Jaguar E-Pace 2017 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.91 m | 1.98 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.65 m | |
| Land Rover Freelander is 11 cm longer than the Jaguar E-Pace, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Land Rover Freelander is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 405 litres | 1234 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2577 litres | |
|
Jaguar E-Pace has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Land Rover Freelander has 829 litres less trunk space than the Jaguar E-Pace. This could mean that the Land Rover Freelander uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.46 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Freelander is 0.16 metres less than that of the Jaguar E-Pace. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`505 | 2`400 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 8200 | 16 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Freelander has
|
Jaguar E-Pace has
| |