Land Rover Freelander 2012 vs Nissan X-Trail 2017
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 420 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 9.4 seconds | |
|
Nissan X-Trail is a more dynamic driving. Land Rover Freelander engine produces 27 HP less power than Nissan X-Trail, but torque is 40 NM more than Nissan X-Trail. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Freelander reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 5.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.3 l/100km | 7.2 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan X-Trail is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Land Rover Freelander consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Freelander could require 60 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Freelander consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1130 km in combined cycle | 1070 km in combined cycle | |
| 1250 km on highway | 1150 km on highway | ||
| 810 km with real consumption | 830 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Jaguar XF, Land Rover Discovery Sport | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Opel Vivaro | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan X-Trail might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Land Rover Freelander 2012 2.2 engine: This engine is recognized for its reliability, power, and relatively low fuel consumption, as well as its durability in demanding conditions without frequent failures. However, it is sensitible to oil quality ... More about Land Rover Freelander 2012 2.2 engine Nissan X-Trail 2017 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.69 m | |
| Width: | 1.91 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.71 m | |
| Land Rover Freelander is 19 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, 9 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Freelander is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 405 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1877 litres | |
|
Nissan X-Trail has more luggage space. Land Rover Freelander has 145 litres less trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Freelander is 0.1 metres more than that of the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`505 | 2`350 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 9600 | 21 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Freelander has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |