Land Rover Freelander 2012 vs Jaguar E-Pace 2018

 
Land Rover Freelander
2012 - 2014
Jaguar E-Pace
2018 - 2020
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.2 Diesel2.0 Diesel
Camshaft drive: Timing chain and beltTiming chain

Performance

Power: 150 HP180 HP
Torque: 420 NM430 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.7 seconds9.9 seconds
Jaguar E-Pace is a more dynamic driving.
Land Rover Freelander engine produces 30 HP less power than Jaguar E-Pace, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Jaguar E-Pace. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Freelander reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.05.2
Real fuel consumption: 8.3 l/100km7.1 l/100km
The Jaguar E-Pace is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Land Rover Freelander consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar E-Pace, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Freelander could require 120 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Freelander consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar E-Pace.
Fuel tank capacity: 68 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1130 km in combined cycle1050 km in combined cycle
1250 km on highway1140 km on highway
810 km with real consumption770 km with real consumption
Land Rover Freelander gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 560'000 km350'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Freelander engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 10 years11 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Jaguar XF, Land Rover Discovery SportInstalled on at least 6 other car models, including Jaguar XF, Land Rover Discovery Sport, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, Jaguar XE
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jaguar E-Pace might be a better choice in this respect.
Land Rover Freelander 2012 2.2 engine: This engine is recognized for its reliability, power, and relatively low fuel consumption, as well as its durability in demanding conditions without frequent failures. However, it is sensitible to oil quality ...  More about Land Rover Freelander 2012 2.2 engine 

Jaguar E-Pace 2018 2.0 engine: This engine is known for its relatively limited lifespan. In early production models, balance shaft bearings wore out quickly and started making noise. The chain-driven timing system, located on the flywheel ...  More about Jaguar E-Pace 2018 2.0 engine 

Dimensions

Length: 4.50 m4.40 m
Width: 1.91 m1.98 m
Height: 1.74 m1.65 m
Land Rover Freelander is 11 cm longer than the Jaguar E-Pace, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Land Rover Freelander is 9 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 405 litres1234 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data2577 litres
Jaguar E-Pace has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, Land Rover Freelander has 829 litres less trunk space than the Jaguar E-Pace. This could mean that the Land Rover Freelander uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable.
Turning diameter: 11.3 meters11.5 meters
The turning circle of the Land Rover Freelander is 0.2 metres less than that of the Jaguar E-Pace.
Gross weight (kg): 2`5052`400
Safety: no data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 820016 800
Pros and Cons: Land Rover Freelander has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • lower price
Jaguar E-Pace has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv