Land Rover Freelander 2012 vs Volvo XC60 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 175 HP | |
| Torque: | 420 NM | 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
|
Volvo XC60 is a more dynamic driving. Land Rover Freelander engine produces 25 HP less power than Volvo XC60, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Freelander reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 6.0 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1130 km in combined cycle | 1160 km in combined cycle | |
| 1250 km on highway | 1400 km on highway | ||
| 810 km with real consumption | 900 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Volvo XC60 2008: The car is fitted with Haldex Generation IV proactive automatic all-wheel drive. Haldex processes data from the ABS control unit and the engine control unit and can increase the pressure on the multi-disc clutch for faster engagement when required. It has a 100% front to 0% rear torque split when not engaged with a maximum 50% to 50% torque split between axes. | |||
| Land Rover Freelander 2012 2.2 engine: This engine is recognized for its reliability, power, and relatively low fuel consumption, as well as its durability in demanding conditions without frequent failures. However, it is sensitible to oil quality ... More about Land Rover Freelander 2012 2.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | no data | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.71 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 405 litres | 495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1455 litres | |
|
Volvo XC60 has more luggage space. Land Rover Freelander has 90 litres less trunk space than the Volvo XC60. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Freelander is 0.6 metres less than that of the Volvo XC60, which means Land Rover Freelander can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`505 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 9600 | 9000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Freelander has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |