Land Rover Freelander 2012 vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2015
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 420 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 9.6 seconds | |
| Land Rover Freelander and Land Rover Range Rover Evoque have the same engine power, but Land Rover Freelander torque is 20 NM more than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. Land Rover Freelander reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 60 litres | |
| 810 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 560'000 km | 560'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 10 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | no data | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.64 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 405 litres | 575 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has more luggage space. Land Rover Freelander has 170 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`350 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 10 800 | 21 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Freelander has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
| |