Land Rover Freelander 2012 vs Jeep Renegade 2014
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 420 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
| Land Rover Freelander engine produces 10 HP more power than Jeep Renegade, whereas torque is 70 NM more than Jeep Renegade. Despite the higher power, Land Rover Freelander reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 5.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.3 l/100km | 6.5 l/100km | |
|
The Jeep Renegade is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Land Rover Freelander consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Renegade, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Freelander could require 135 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Land Rover Freelander consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Renegade. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 48 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1130 km in combined cycle | 940 km in combined cycle | |
| 1250 km on highway | 1040 km on highway | ||
| 810 km with real consumption | 730 km with real consumption | ||
| Land Rover Freelander gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Jeep Renegade 2014: The car is equipped with Active Drive I/LOW, a full-time 4x4 system that requires no driver input. Under normal conditions, this system sends all available torque to the front wheels. If the system detects that the front wheels are moving faster than the rear wheels, it will send power through the power transfer unit to the rear axle to maintain the same wheelspeed. Active Drive Low adds a low-range gear in 4WD Low mode for situations requiring low speeds, such as crawling across big rocks or towing a marine trailer out of the water. The Active Drive Low system provides a 20:1 crawl ratio with significantly controlled throttle response. | |||
| Land Rover Freelander 2012 2.2 engine: This engine is recognized for its reliability, power, and relatively low fuel consumption, as well as its durability in demanding conditions without frequent failures. However, it is sensitible to oil quality ... More about Land Rover Freelander 2012 2.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.26 m | |
| Width: | no data | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.67 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 405 litres | 351 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1297 litres | |
|
Land Rover Freelander has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Land Rover Freelander has 54 litres more trunk space than the Jeep Renegade. The Jeep Renegade may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Freelander is 0.2 metres more than that of the Jeep Renegade. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`010 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 8200 | 13 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Freelander has
|
Jeep Renegade has
| |