Land Rover Freelander 2012 vs Jeep Compass 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 240 HP | 156 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Freelander is more dynamic to drive. Land Rover Freelander engine produces 84 HP more power than Jeep Compass, whereas torque is 150 NM more than Jeep Compass. Thanks to more power Land Rover Freelander reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.6 | 7.6 | |
|
The Jeep Compass is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Freelander consumes 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Compass, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Freelander could require 300 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 51 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| 930 km on highway | 830 km on highway | ||
| Land Rover Freelander gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.47 m | |
| Width: | no data | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.66 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 405 litres | 458 litres | |
|
Jeep Compass has more luggage space. Land Rover Freelander has 53 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Compass. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Freelander is 0.5 metres more than that of the Jeep Compass, which means Land Rover Freelander can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`010 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 10 800 | 8200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Freelander has
|
Jeep Compass has
| |