Land Rover Freelander 2012 vs Jaguar E-Pace 2017
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 240 HP | 249 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 365 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 seconds | 7 seconds | |
|
Jaguar E-Pace is a more dynamic driving. Land Rover Freelander engine produces 9 HP less power than Jaguar E-Pace, whereas torque is 25 NM less than Jaguar E-Pace. Due to the lower power, Land Rover Freelander reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.6 | 7.7 | |
|
The Jaguar E-Pace is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Land Rover Freelander consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar E-Pace, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Land Rover Freelander could require 285 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 880 km in combined cycle | |
| 930 km on highway | 1030 km on highway | ||
| Jaguar E-Pace gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Jaguar E-Pace engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Land Rover Discovery Sport, Jaguar XJ, Jaguar XF | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Jaguar F-Type, Jaguar XF, Jaguar XE | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Freelander might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Jaguar E-Pace engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | no data | 1.98 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.65 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | 405 litres | 1234 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2577 litres | |
|
Jaguar E-Pace has more luggage space. Land Rover Freelander has 829 litres less trunk space than the Jaguar E-Pace. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.46 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Freelander is 0.16 metres less than that of the Jaguar E-Pace. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`400 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 8200 | 16 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Freelander has
|
Jaguar E-Pace has
| |