Land Rover Freelander 2003 vs Land Rover Freelander 2007
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.8 - 2.5 | 2.2 - 3.2 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 112 - 177 HP | 150 - 233 HP | |
Torque: | 160 - 260 NM | 317 - 420 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 - 15.3 seconds | 8.9 - 11.7 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.6 - 12.4 | 6.9 - 11.2 | |
Land Rover Freelander 2003 petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Land Rover Freelander 2007. On average, Land Rover Freelander 2003 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander 2007. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.42 m | 4.50 m | |
Width: | 1.81 m | 1.91 m | |
Height: | 1.72 m | 1.75 m | |
Land Rover Freelander 2003 is smaller. Land Rover Freelander 2003 is 8 cm shorter than the Land Rover Freelander 2007, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Land Rover Freelander 2003 is 3 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 755 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.6 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`000 | ~ 2`169 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 2600 | 6400 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 7.6/10 | 7.4/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Freelander has
|
Land Rover Freelander has
| |