Land Rover Freelander 2003 vs Nissan X-Trail 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Land Rover Freelander is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Nissan X-Trail can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Nissan X-Trail also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 1.8 - 2.5 | 2.0 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 112 - 177 HP | 136 - 165 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 - 260 NM | 192 - 314 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 - 15.3 seconds | 9.9 - 13.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.6 - 12.4 | 7.1 - 10.0 | |
|
Land Rover Freelander petrol engines consumes on average 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than Nissan X-Trail. On average, Land Rover Freelander equipped with diesel engines consume 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.42 m | 4.51 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.70 m | |
| Land Rover Freelander is 9 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, 5 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Freelander is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 410 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1841 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Freelander is 1 metres more than that of the Nissan X-Trail, which means Land Rover Freelander can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`000 | ~ 2`009 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 2800 | 2400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.6/10 | 7.0/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Freelander has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |