Land Rover Freelander 2003 vs BMW X3 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.8 - 2.5 | 2.0 - 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 112 - 177 HP | 150 - 231 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 - 260 NM | 200 - 500 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 - 15.3 seconds | 7.4 - 12 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.6 - 12.4 | 7.2 - 12.0 | |
|
Land Rover Freelander petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than BMW X3. On average, Land Rover Freelander equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW X3. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.42 m | 4.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.67 m | |
|
Land Rover Freelander is smaller, but higher. Land Rover Freelander is 14 cm shorter than the BMW X3, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Land Rover Freelander is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 480 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1560 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Freelander is 0.4 metres less than that of the BMW X3, which means Land Rover Freelander can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`000 | ~ 2`292 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 4200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Freelander has
|
BMW X3 has
| |