Land Rover Freelander 1998 vs Land Rover Freelander 2000
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Land Rover Freelander 1998 is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Land Rover Freelander 2000 has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 1.8 - 2.0 | 1.8 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 97 - 120 HP | 112 - 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 165 - 210 NM | 160 - 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 - 14.6 seconds | 11.1 - 15.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 - 10.2 | 8.6 - 12.4 | |
|
Land Rover Freelander 1998 petrol engines consumes on average 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Land Rover Freelander 2000. On average, Land Rover Freelander 1998 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander 2000. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.76 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Land Rover Freelander 1998 is 2 cm shorter than the Land Rover Freelander 2000, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`000 | ~ 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Freelander has
|
Land Rover Freelander has
| |