Land Rover Freelander 1998 vs Honda HR-V 1998
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Land Rover Freelander is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Honda HR-V has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Land Rover Freelander is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Honda HR-V can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Honda HR-V also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 1.8 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | 1.6 (petrol) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Land Rover Freelander is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 97 - 120 HP | 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 165 - 210 NM | 135 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 - 14.6 seconds | 11.2 - 13.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 - 10.2 | 8.2 - 8.6 | |
|
Land Rover Freelander petrol engines consumes on average 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than Honda HR-V. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.01 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.59 m | |
|
Land Rover Freelander is larger. Land Rover Freelander is 37 cm longer than the Honda HR-V, 10 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Freelander is 17 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 285 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Freelander is 1.2 metres more than that of the Honda HR-V, which means Land Rover Freelander can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`000 | ~ 1`627 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Freelander has
|
Honda HR-V has
| |