Land Rover Freelander 2000 vs Land Rover Freelander 1998
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Land Rover Freelander 2000 is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas Land Rover Freelander 1998 is available only with manual gearbox. | |||
| Engines: | 1.8 - 2.5 | 1.8 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 112 - 177 HP | 97 - 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 - 260 NM | 165 - 210 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 - 15.3 seconds | 11.1 - 14.6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.6 - 12.4 | 7.7 - 10.2 | |
|
Land Rover Freelander 2000 petrol engines consumes on average 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Land Rover Freelander 1998. On average, Land Rover Freelander 2000 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Freelander 1998. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.76 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Land Rover Freelander 2000 is 2 cm longer than the Land Rover Freelander 1998, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`000 | ~ 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Freelander has
|
Land Rover Freelander has
| |