Land Rover Freelander 2007 vs Volvo XC60 2008
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Land Rover Freelander is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Volvo XC60 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Volvo XC60 also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.2 - 3.2 | 2.0 - 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 - 233 HP | 163 - 285 HP | |
| Torque: | 317 - 420 NM | 300 - 440 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 - 11.7 seconds | 7.5 - 10.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 - 11.2 | 6.0 - 11.9 | |
|
Land Rover Freelander petrol engines consumes on average 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volvo XC60. On average, a Land Rover Freelander with diesel engines consumes about the same amount of fuel per 100 km as a Volvo XC60. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.91 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.71 m | |
| Land Rover Freelander is 13 cm shorter than the Volvo XC60, 2 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Freelander is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 755 litres | 495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1455 litres | |
|
Land Rover Freelander has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Land Rover Freelander has 260 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC60. The Volvo XC60 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 12.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Freelander is 0.5 metres less than that of the Volvo XC60, which means Land Rover Freelander can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`169 | ~ 2`499 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 6400 | 9000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.4/10 | 7.6/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Freelander has
|
Volvo XC60 has
| |