Land Rover Freelander 2007 vs Honda CR-V 2007
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 2.2 - 3.2 | 2.0 - 2.4 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 150 - 233 HP | 140 - 166 HP | |
Torque: | 317 - 420 NM | 192 - 340 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 - 11.7 seconds | 10.2 - 12.2 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 - 11.2 | 6.5 - 9.5 | |
Land Rover Freelander petrol engines consumes on average 2.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Honda CR-V. On average, Land Rover Freelander equipped with diesel engines consume 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.50 m | 4.52 m | |
Width: | 1.91 m | 1.82 m | |
Height: | 1.75 m | 1.68 m | |
Land Rover Freelander is 2 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 9 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Freelander is 7 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 755 litres | 556 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 955 litres | |
Land Rover Freelander has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Land Rover Freelander has 199 litres more trunk space than the Honda CR-V. The Honda CR-V may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 11.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Land Rover Freelander is 0.2 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`169 | ~ 2`105 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | no data | above average | |
Average price (€): | 6400 | 5000 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 7.4/10 | 8.8/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Freelander has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |