Land Rover Freelander 2007 vs Honda CR-V 2007

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Land Rover Freelander
2007 - 2012
Honda CR-V
2007 - 2010
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 2.2 - 3.22.0 - 2.4

Performance

Power: 150 - 233 HP140 - 166 HP
Torque: 317 - 420 NM192 - 340 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.9 - 11.7 seconds10.2 - 12.2 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.9 - 11.26.5 - 9.5
Land Rover Freelander petrol engines consumes on average 2.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Honda CR-V. On average, Land Rover Freelander equipped with diesel engines consume 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.50 m4.52 m
Width: 1.91 m1.82 m
Height: 1.75 m1.68 m
Land Rover Freelander is 2 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 9 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Freelander is 7 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 755 litres556 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data955 litres
Land Rover Freelander has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, Land Rover Freelander has 199 litres more trunk space than the Honda CR-V. The Honda CR-V may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers.
Turning diameter: 11.6 meters11.8 meters
The turning circle of the Land Rover Freelander is 0.2 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`169~ 2`105
Safety:
Quality: no data
above average
Average price (€): 66005600
Rating in user reviews: 7.4/10 8.8/10
Pros and Cons: Land Rover Freelander has
  • roomier boot
  • higher safety
Honda CR-V has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • higher ratings in user reviews
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv