Land Rover Freelander 2007 vs Nissan X-Trail 2007
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Land Rover Freelander is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Nissan X-Trail can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Nissan X-Trail also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.2 - 3.2 | 2.0 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 - 233 HP | 141 - 173 HP | |
| Torque: | 317 - 420 NM | 196 - 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.9 - 11.7 seconds | 9.8 - 12.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 - 11.2 | 7.1 - 9.6 | |
|
Land Rover Freelander petrol engines consumes on average 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Nissan X-Trail. On average, Land Rover Freelander equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.91 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.68 m | |
| Land Rover Freelander is 13 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, 13 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Freelander is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 755 litres | 479 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1742 litres | |
|
Land Rover Freelander has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Nissan X-Trail may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.6 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Freelander is 0.8 metres more than that of the Nissan X-Trail, which means Land Rover Freelander can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`169 kg | ~ 2`079 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 5400 | 4000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.4/10 | 7.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Freelander has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |