Land Rover Freelander 2007 vs BMW X3 2006

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Land Rover Freelander
2007 - 2012
BMW X3
2006 - 2010
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 2.2 - 3.22.0 - 3.0

Performance

Power: 150 - 233 HP143 - 286 HP
Torque: 317 - 420 NM200 - 580 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.9 - 11.7 seconds6.6 - 12 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.9 - 11.26.2 - 10.0
Land Rover Freelander petrol engines consumes on average 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than BMW X3. On average, Land Rover Freelander equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X3.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.50 m4.57 m
Width: 1.91 m1.85 m
Height: 1.75 m1.67 m
Land Rover Freelander is 7 cm shorter than the BMW X3, 6 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Freelander is 8 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 755 litres480 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1560 litres
Land Rover Freelander has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, Land Rover Freelander has 275 litres more trunk space than the BMW X3. The BMW X3 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers.
Turning diameter: 11.6 meters12 meters
The turning circle of the Land Rover Freelander is 0.4 metres less than that of the BMW X3, which means Land Rover Freelander can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`169~ 2`289
Safety:
Quality: no data
average
Average price (€): 66006800
Pros and Cons: Land Rover Freelander has
  • roomier boot
  • higher safety
BMW X3 has
  • lower fuel consumption
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv