Land Rover Freelander 2012 vs Nissan X-Trail 2017
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.2 | 1.3 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 - 240 HP | 130 - 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 - 420 NM | 240 - 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 - 11.7 seconds | 9.4 - 12.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 - 9.6 | 4.9 - 6.2 | |
|
Land Rover Freelander petrol engines consumes on average 3.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Nissan X-Trail. On average, Land Rover Freelander equipped with diesel engines consume 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.69 m | |
| Width: | 1.91 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.71 m | |
| Land Rover Freelander is 19 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, 9 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Freelander is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 405 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1982 litres | |
|
Nissan X-Trail has more luggage space. Land Rover Freelander has 145 litres less trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Freelander is 0.1 metres more than that of the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`505 | ~ 2`290 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 8200 | 18 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Freelander has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |