Land Rover Freelander 2012 vs Mini Countryman 2014
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.2 | 1.6 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 - 240 HP | 90 - 218 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 - 420 NM | 153 - 305 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 - 11.7 seconds | 6.9 - 13.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 - 9.6 | 4.2 - 7.5 | |
|
Land Rover Freelander petrol engines consumes on average 2.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mini Countryman. On average, Land Rover Freelander equipped with diesel engines consume 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mini Countryman. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.11 m | |
| Width: | 1.91 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.56 m | |
|
Land Rover Freelander is larger. Land Rover Freelander is 40 cm longer than the Mini Countryman, 12 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Freelander is 18 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 405 litres | 350 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1170 litres | |
|
Land Rover Freelander has more luggage capacity. Land Rover Freelander has 55 litres more trunk space than the Mini Countryman. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Land Rover Freelander is 0.3 metres less than that of the Mini Countryman. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`505 | ~ 1`860 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 7800 | 10 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Freelander has
|
Mini Countryman has
| |