Land Rover Freelander 2012 vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2015
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Land Rover Freelander is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is available only with automatic gearbox. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Land Rover Freelander is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Land Rover Range Rover Evoque can be equipped only with four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Land Rover Freelander also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.2 | 2.0 - 2.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 - 240 HP | 150 - 240 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 - 420 NM | 340 - 430 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 - 11.7 seconds | 7.6 - 10 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 - 9.6 | 5.1 - 7.8 | |
|
Land Rover Freelander petrol engines consumes on average 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. On average, Land Rover Freelander equipped with diesel engines consume 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.91 m | 1.96 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.65 m | |
| Land Rover Freelander is 13 cm longer than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Land Rover Freelander is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 405 litres | 575 litres | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Land Rover Freelander has 170 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. This could mean that the Land Rover Freelander uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`505 | ~ 2`350 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 10 800 | 21 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Land Rover Freelander has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
| |