Land Rover Freelander 2012 vs Jeep Patriot 2007
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.2 | 2.0 - 2.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 - 240 HP | 140 - 174 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 - 420 NM | 191 - 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 - 11.7 seconds | 10.7 - 11 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 - 9.6 | 6.6 - 8.8 | |
|
Land Rover Freelander petrol engines consumes on average 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Jeep Patriot. On average, Land Rover Freelander equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Patriot. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.41 m | |
| Width: | 1.91 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.64 m | |
|
Land Rover Freelander is larger. Land Rover Freelander is 9 cm longer than the Jeep Patriot, 16 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Freelander is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 405 litres | 652 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1777 litres | |
|
Jeep Patriot has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Land Rover Freelander has 247 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Patriot. This could mean that the Land Rover Freelander uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`505 | ~ 1`945 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 9600 | 5600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Jeep Patriot has
| |