Land Rover Freelander 2012 vs Jeep Compass 2013
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.2 | 2.0 - 2.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 - 240 HP | 136 - 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 - 420 NM | 190 - 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 - 11.7 seconds | 10.6 - 10.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 - 9.6 | 6.0 - 9.0 | |
|
Land Rover Freelander petrol engines consumes on average 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Jeep Compass. On average, Land Rover Freelander equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Compass. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.47 m | |
| Width: | 1.91 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.66 m | |
|
Land Rover Freelander is larger. Land Rover Freelander is 4 cm longer than the Jeep Compass, 10 cm wider, while the height of Land Rover Freelander is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 405 litres | 458 litres | |
|
Jeep Compass has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Land Rover Freelander has 53 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Compass. This could mean that the Land Rover Freelander uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.3 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`505 | ~ 2`030 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 10 800 | 8200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Jeep Compass has
| |