Jeep Grand Cherokee 1993 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 2002
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.2 Petrol | 4.7 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 211 HP | 258 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 425 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | 8.3 seconds | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee 2002 is a more dynamic driving. Jeep Grand Cherokee 1993 engine produces 47 HP less power than Jeep Grand Cherokee 2002, whereas torque is 25 NM less than Jeep Grand Cherokee 2002. Due to the lower power, Jeep Grand Cherokee 1993 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 15.7 | 16.5 | |
|
The Jeep Grand Cherokee 1993 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Grand Cherokee 1993 consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee 2002, which means that by driving the Jeep Grand Cherokee 1993 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 87 litres | 78 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 550 km in combined cycle | 470 km in combined cycle | |
| 690 km on highway | 600 km on highway | ||
| Jeep Grand Cherokee 1993 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 193 mm (7.6 inches) | 210 mm (8.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Jeep Grand Cherokee 2002 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.61 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.81 m | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee 1993 is smaller. Jeep Grand Cherokee 1993 is 11 cm shorter than the Jeep Grand Cherokee 2002, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Grand Cherokee 1993 is 16 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1136 litres | 1104 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2254 litres | 2047 litres | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee 1993 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Jeep Grand Cherokee 1993 has 32 litres more trunk space than the Jeep Grand Cherokee 2002. The Jeep Grand Cherokee 2002 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Grand Cherokee 1993 (by 207 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Grand Cherokee 1993 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee 2002. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`510 | 2`495 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Jeep Grand Cherokee 2002 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Jeep Grand Cherokee 1993 has serious deffects in 140 percent more cases than Jeep Grand Cherokee 2002, so Jeep Grand Cherokee 2002 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4800 | 3400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.2/10 | 7.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |