Jeep Grand Cherokee 1997 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 1997
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.8 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 278 NM | 292 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 seconds | 19.5 seconds | |
| Jeep Grand Cherokee engine produces 9 HP less power than Mitsubishi Pajero, whereas torque is 14 NM less than Mitsubishi Pajero. Despite less power, Jeep Grand Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.9 | 12.4 | |
|
The Jeep Grand Cherokee is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Grand Cherokee consumes 2.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that by driving the Jeep Grand Cherokee over 15,000 km in a year you can save 375 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 87 litres | 92 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 870 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| 1040 km on highway | 800 km on highway | ||
| Jeep Grand Cherokee gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 520'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mitsubishi Pajero engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Chrysler Voyager, Jeep Cherokee | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Jeep Grand Cherokee engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.90 m | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee is smaller. Jeep Grand Cherokee is 20 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Grand Cherokee is 25 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Grand Cherokee is 0.6 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means Jeep Grand Cherokee can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`300 | 3`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Jeep Grand Cherokee has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Pajero, so Mitsubishi Pajero quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4800 | 2800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |