Jeep Grand Cherokee 1999 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 1997
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.1 Diesel | 2.8 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 373 NM | 292 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14 seconds | 19.5 seconds | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee is more dynamic to drive. Jeep Grand Cherokee engine produces 25 HP more power than Mitsubishi Pajero, whereas torque is 81 NM more than Mitsubishi Pajero. Thanks to more power Jeep Grand Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 5.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.7 | 12.4 | |
|
The Jeep Grand Cherokee is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Grand Cherokee consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that by driving the Jeep Grand Cherokee over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 78 litres | 92 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| 800 km on highway | 800 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi Pajero gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.61 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.90 m | |
| Jeep Grand Cherokee is 9 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 8 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Grand Cherokee is 14 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1104 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2047 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Grand Cherokee is 0.7 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means Jeep Grand Cherokee can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`505 | 3`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Mitsubishi Pajero has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Jeep Grand Cherokee has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Pajero, so Mitsubishi Pajero quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 2800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |