Jeep Grand Cherokee 1999 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.1 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 218 HP | |
| Torque: | 373 NM | 510 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14 seconds | 9 seconds | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005 is a more dynamic driving. Jeep Grand Cherokee 1999 engine produces 68 HP less power than Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005, whereas torque is 137 NM less than Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005. Due to the lower power, Jeep Grand Cherokee 1999 reaches 100 km/h speed 5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.7 | 10.2 | |
|
The Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Grand Cherokee 1999 consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Grand Cherokee 1999 could require 225 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 78 litres | 78 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 800 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
| Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005 3.0 engine: The main issues with this diesel engine stem from the fuel system and its sensitive piezo injectors. These injectors are known for being highly demanding in terms of fuel quality, which can lead to performance ... More about Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.61 m | 4.75 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.76 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee 1999 is smaller, but slightly higher. Jeep Grand Cherokee 1999 is 14 cm shorter than the Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Grand Cherokee 1999 is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1104 litres | 978 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2047 litres | 1909 litres | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee 1999 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Jeep Grand Cherokee 1999 has 126 litres more trunk space than the Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005. The Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Grand Cherokee 1999 (by 138 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Grand Cherokee 1999 is 0.1 metres less than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`505 | 2`750 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Jeep Grand Cherokee 1999 has serious deffects in 230 percent more cases than Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005, so Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 5600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |