Jeep Grand Cherokee 1999 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.0 Petrol | 3.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 250 HP | |
| Torque: | 295 NM | 329 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 seconds | 10.8 seconds | |
| Jeep Grand Cherokee engine produces 60 HP less power than Mitsubishi Pajero, whereas torque is 34 NM less than Mitsubishi Pajero. Due to the lower power, Jeep Grand Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 16.0 | 13.5 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Pajero is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Grand Cherokee consumes 2.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Grand Cherokee could require 375 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 78 litres | 90 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 480 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
| 630 km on highway | 800 km on highway | ||
| Mitsubishi Pajero gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.61 m | 4.90 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.87 m | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee is smaller. Jeep Grand Cherokee is 29 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Grand Cherokee is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 1104 litres | 215 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 215 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 1104 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2047 litres | 1790 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Grand Cherokee (by 257 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Grand Cherokee is 0.5 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means Jeep Grand Cherokee can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`425 | 3`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | Mitsubishi Pajero has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Jeep Grand Cherokee has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Mitsubishi Pajero, so Mitsubishi Pajero quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 11 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |