Jeep Grand Cherokee 2001 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 1997
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.7 Diesel | 2.8 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 292 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 16.8 seconds | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee is more dynamic to drive. Jeep Grand Cherokee engine produces 38 HP more power than Mitsubishi Pajero, whereas torque is 108 NM more than Mitsubishi Pajero. Thanks to more power Jeep Grand Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 5.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.7 | 12.5 | |
|
The Jeep Grand Cherokee is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Grand Cherokee consumes 2.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that by driving the Jeep Grand Cherokee over 15,000 km in a year you can save 420 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 78 litres | 92 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
| 960 km on highway | 850 km on highway | ||
| Jeep Grand Cherokee gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 520'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 3 years | 13 years | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Pajero might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Jeep Grand Cherokee engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.61 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.90 m | |
| Jeep Grand Cherokee is 9 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 6 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Grand Cherokee is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1104 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2047 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Grand Cherokee is 0.1 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Pajero. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`506 | 3`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | Jeep Grand Cherokee has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mitsubishi Pajero has serious deffects in 80 percent more cases than Jeep Grand Cherokee, so Jeep Grand Cherokee quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |