Jeep Grand Cherokee 2001 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2008
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.7 Diesel | 3.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 441 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
| Jeep Grand Cherokee engine produces 37 HP less power than Mitsubishi Pajero, whereas torque is 41 NM less than Mitsubishi Pajero. Due to the lower power, Jeep Grand Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.7 | 9.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.0 l/100km | 10.7 l/100km | |
|
By specification Jeep Grand Cherokee consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Grand Cherokee could require 60 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Grand Cherokee consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 78 litres | 88 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 940 km in combined cycle | |
| 960 km on highway | 1100 km on highway | ||
| 700 km with real consumption | 820 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi Pajero gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 3 years | 26 years | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Pajero might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Jeep Grand Cherokee engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.61 m | 4.90 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.87 m | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee is smaller. Jeep Grand Cherokee is 29 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Grand Cherokee is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1104 litres | 215 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2047 litres | 1790 litres | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Jeep Grand Cherokee has 889 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Pajero. The Mitsubishi Pajero may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Grand Cherokee (by 257 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Grand Cherokee is 0.5 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means Jeep Grand Cherokee can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`506 | 2`910 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 11 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |