Jeep Grand Cherokee 2001 vs Jeep Cherokee 2002
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.7 Diesel | 2.8 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 12.6 seconds | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee is more dynamic to drive. Jeep Grand Cherokee engine produces 13 HP more power than Jeep Cherokee, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Jeep Cherokee. Thanks to more power Jeep Grand Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.7 | 9.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.0 l/100km | 10.9 l/100km | |
|
By specification Jeep Grand Cherokee consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Cherokee, which means that by driving the Jeep Grand Cherokee over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Jeep Grand Cherokee consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Cherokee. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 78 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| 960 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
| 700 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
| Jeep Grand Cherokee gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 440'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Jeep Grand Cherokee engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 3 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Chrysler Voyager | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jeep Cherokee might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.61 m | 4.44 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.87 m | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee is larger, but slightly lower. Jeep Grand Cherokee is 17 cm longer than the Jeep Cherokee, 2 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Grand Cherokee is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1104 litres | 820 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2047 litres | 1950 litres | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has more luggage capacity. Jeep Grand Cherokee has 284 litres more trunk space than the Jeep Cherokee. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Grand Cherokee (by 97 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Grand Cherokee is 1 metres more than that of the Jeep Cherokee, which means Jeep Grand Cherokee can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`506 | 2`540 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 5000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
|
Jeep Cherokee has
| |