Jeep Grand Cherokee 2001 vs Honda CR-V 2004
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.7 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 12 seconds | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee is more dynamic to drive. Jeep Grand Cherokee engine produces 13 HP more power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 210 NM more than Honda CR-V. Thanks to more power Jeep Grand Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.7 | 9.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.0 l/100km | 10.6 l/100km | |
|
By specification Jeep Grand Cherokee consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Grand Cherokee could require 60 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Grand Cherokee consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 78 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
| 960 km on highway | 760 km on highway | ||
| 700 km with real consumption | 540 km with real consumption | ||
| Jeep Grand Cherokee gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Jeep Grand Cherokee engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 3 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Honda Civic, Honda Accord, Honda FR-V, Honda Stream | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Honda CR-V might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Jeep Grand Cherokee engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.61 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.71 m | |
| Jeep Grand Cherokee is 3 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 6 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Grand Cherokee is 13 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1104 litres | 525 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2047 litres | 952 litres | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Jeep Grand Cherokee has 579 litres more trunk space than the Honda CR-V. The Honda CR-V may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Grand Cherokee (by 1095 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Grand Cherokee is 1.5 metres more than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Jeep Grand Cherokee can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`506 | 1`910 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Honda CR-V has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Jeep Grand Cherokee has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Honda CR-V, so Honda CR-V quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 3200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.4/10 | 8.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |