Jeep Grand Cherokee 2001 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 1996
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.7 Diesel | 2.7 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Jeep Grand Cherokee) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Toyota Land Cruiser) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 152 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Jeep Grand Cherokee engine produces 11 HP more power than Toyota Land Cruiser, whereas torque is 160 NM more than Toyota Land Cruiser. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.7 | 13.0 | |
|
The Jeep Grand Cherokee is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Grand Cherokee consumes 3.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means that by driving the Jeep Grand Cherokee over 15,000 km in a year you can save 495 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 78 litres | 90 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| 960 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
| Jeep Grand Cherokee gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 700'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Toyota Land Cruiser engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 3 years | 10 years | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Land Cruiser might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Jeep Grand Cherokee engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.61 m | 4.73 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.86 m | |
| Jeep Grand Cherokee is 12 cm shorter than the Toyota Land Cruiser, 11 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Grand Cherokee is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1104 litres | 740 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2047 litres | 1150 litres | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Jeep Grand Cherokee has 364 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Land Cruiser. The Toyota Land Cruiser may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Grand Cherokee (by 897 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Grand Cherokee is 0.5 metres more than that of the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means Jeep Grand Cherokee can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`506 | 2`680 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3600 | 6800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has
| |