Jeep Grand Cherokee 2001 vs Nissan X-Trail 2001
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.7 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 114 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 13.7 seconds | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee is more dynamic to drive. Jeep Grand Cherokee engine produces 49 HP more power than Nissan X-Trail, whereas torque is 130 NM more than Nissan X-Trail. Thanks to more power Jeep Grand Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.7 | 7.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.0 l/100km | 8.3 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan X-Trail is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jeep Grand Cherokee consumes 2.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Grand Cherokee could require 375 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Grand Cherokee consumes 2.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 78 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 960 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| 700 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.61 m | 4.51 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee is larger. Jeep Grand Cherokee is 10 cm longer than the Nissan X-Trail, 8 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Grand Cherokee is 16 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1104 litres | 410 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2047 litres | 1841 litres | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has more luggage capacity. Jeep Grand Cherokee has 694 litres more trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Grand Cherokee (by 206 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Grand Cherokee is 0.9 metres more than that of the Nissan X-Trail, which means Jeep Grand Cherokee can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`506 kg | 2`050 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`980 kg | 1`534 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 526 kg | 516 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Nissan X-Trail has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Jeep Grand Cherokee has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Nissan X-Trail, so Nissan X-Trail quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |