Jeep Grand Cherokee 2001 vs Nissan Pathfinder 1997
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.7 Diesel | 3.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 334 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Jeep Grand Cherokee engine produces 13 HP more power than Nissan Pathfinder, whereas torque is 66 NM more than Nissan Pathfinder. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.7 | 11.9 | |
|
The Jeep Grand Cherokee is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Grand Cherokee consumes 2.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Pathfinder, which means that by driving the Jeep Grand Cherokee over 15,000 km in a year you can save 330 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 78 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| 960 km on highway | 800 km on highway | ||
| Jeep Grand Cherokee gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.61 m | 4.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.75 m | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee is larger. Jeep Grand Cherokee is 8 cm longer than the Nissan Pathfinder, 2 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Grand Cherokee is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1104 litres | 435 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2047 litres | 1670 litres | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has more luggage capacity. Jeep Grand Cherokee has 669 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Pathfinder. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Grand Cherokee (by 377 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`506 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
|
| |