Jeep Grand Cherokee 2001 vs Mercedes ML 1999
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.7 Diesel | 2.7 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 370 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 11.6 seconds | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee is more dynamic to drive. Jeep Grand Cherokee and Mercedes ML have the same engine power, but Jeep Grand Cherokee torque is 30 NM more than Mercedes ML. Jeep Grand Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.7 | 9.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.0 l/100km | 10.6 l/100km | |
|
By specification Jeep Grand Cherokee consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes ML, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Grand Cherokee could require 30 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Grand Cherokee consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes ML. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 78 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
| 960 km on highway | 870 km on highway | ||
| 700 km with real consumption | 660 km with real consumption | ||
| Jeep Grand Cherokee gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 3 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mercedes C klase, Mercedes E klase, Mercedes G klase | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mercedes ML might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.61 m | 4.59 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee is larger. Jeep Grand Cherokee is 2 cm longer than the Mercedes ML, 1 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Grand Cherokee is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1104 litres | 633 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2047 litres | 2020 litres | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has more luggage capacity. Jeep Grand Cherokee has 471 litres more trunk space than the Mercedes ML. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Grand Cherokee (by 27 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 2`506 kg | 2`810 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`980 kg | 2`045 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 526 kg | 765 kg | |
| Jeep Grand Cherokee load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 45 procentiem less than Mercedes ML. Therefore, Mercedes ML is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
|
Mercedes ML has
| |