Jeep Grand Cherokee 2001 vs Mercedes ML 2001
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.7 Diesel | 2.7 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 370 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 12.2 seconds | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee is more dynamic to drive. Jeep Grand Cherokee and Mercedes ML have the same engine power, but Jeep Grand Cherokee torque is 30 NM more than Mercedes ML. Jeep Grand Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.7 | 9.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.0 l/100km | 9.3 l/100km | |
|
The Mercedes ML is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Jeep Grand Cherokee consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes ML, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Grand Cherokee could require 45 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Jeep Grand Cherokee consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes ML. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 78 litres | 83 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 880 km in combined cycle | |
| 960 km on highway | 1070 km on highway | ||
| 700 km with real consumption | 890 km with real consumption | ||
| Mercedes ML gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 3 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mercedes C klase, Mercedes E klase, Mercedes G klase | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mercedes ML might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.61 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.82 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Jeep Grand Cherokee is 3 cm shorter than the Mercedes ML, width is practically the same , while the height of Jeep Grand Cherokee is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1104 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2047 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`506 | 3`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Average price (€): | 3600 | 2600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.4/10 | 7.7/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
|
Mercedes ML has
| |