Jeep Grand Cherokee 2001 vs Lexus RX 1997
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.7 Diesel | 3.0 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Jeep Grand Cherokee) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Lexus RX) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 201 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 283 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
|
Lexus RX is a more dynamic driving. Jeep Grand Cherokee engine produces 38 HP less power than Lexus RX, but torque is 117 NM more than Lexus RX. Due to the lower power, Jeep Grand Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.7 | 13.0 | |
|
The Jeep Grand Cherokee is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Grand Cherokee consumes 3.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Lexus RX, which means that by driving the Jeep Grand Cherokee over 15,000 km in a year you can save 495 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 78 litres | 73 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 560 km in combined cycle | |
| 960 km on highway | 700 km on highway | ||
| Jeep Grand Cherokee gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.61 m | 4.58 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.66 m | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee is larger. Jeep Grand Cherokee is 3 cm longer than the Lexus RX, 2 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Grand Cherokee is 18 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1104 litres | 489 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2047 litres | 1725 litres | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has more luggage capacity. Jeep Grand Cherokee has 615 litres more trunk space than the Lexus RX. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Grand Cherokee (by 322 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 12.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Grand Cherokee is 0.3 metres less than that of the Lexus RX. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`506 | 2`270 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
|
Lexus RX has
| |