Jeep Grand Cherokee 1999 vs Honda CR-V 1997
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.7 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 235 HP | 128 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 182 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee is more dynamic to drive. Jeep Grand Cherokee engine produces 107 HP more power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 218 NM more than Honda CR-V. Thanks to more power Jeep Grand Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 16.2 | 10.1 | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Grand Cherokee consumes 6.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Grand Cherokee could require 915 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 78 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 480 km in combined cycle | 570 km in combined cycle | |
| 600 km on highway | 670 km on highway | ||
| Honda CR-V gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Jeep Commander | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jeep Grand Cherokee might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Jeep Grand Cherokee engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.61 m | 4.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee is larger. Jeep Grand Cherokee is 8 cm longer than the Honda CR-V, 11 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Grand Cherokee is 12 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1104 litres | 375 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2047 litres | 670 litres | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has more luggage capacity. Jeep Grand Cherokee has 729 litres more trunk space than the Honda CR-V. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Grand Cherokee (by 1377 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Grand Cherokee is 1.3 metres more than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Jeep Grand Cherokee can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`495 | 1`900 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |