Jeep Grand Cherokee 1999 vs Nissan Pathfinder 2001
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.7 Petrol | 3.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 235 HP | 243 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 359 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee is more dynamic to drive. Jeep Grand Cherokee engine produces 8 HP less power than Nissan Pathfinder, but torque is 41 NM more than Nissan Pathfinder. Despite less power, Jeep Grand Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 16.2 | 15.1 | |
| Jeep Grand Cherokee consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Pathfinder, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Grand Cherokee could require 165 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 78 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 480 km in combined cycle | 520 km in combined cycle | |
| 600 km on highway | 540 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 25 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Jeep Commander | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Infiniti FX, Nissan Murano | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Pathfinder might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Jeep Grand Cherokee engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.61 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.80 m | |
| Jeep Grand Cherokee is 3 cm shorter than the Nissan Pathfinder, 4 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1104 litres | 1076 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2047 litres | 2407 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Jeep Grand Cherokee has 28 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Pathfinder. The Nissan Pathfinder may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Pathfinder (by 360 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`495 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Nissan Pathfinder has
| |