Jeep Grand Cherokee 1999 vs Mitsubishi Outlander 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.7 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 235 HP | 160 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 213 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee is more dynamic to drive. Jeep Grand Cherokee engine produces 75 HP more power than Mitsubishi Outlander, whereas torque is 187 NM more than Mitsubishi Outlander. Thanks to more power Jeep Grand Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 16.2 | 10.1 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Outlander is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Grand Cherokee consumes 6.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Grand Cherokee could require 915 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 78 litres | 59 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 480 km in combined cycle | 580 km in combined cycle | |
| Mitsubishi Outlander gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 22 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Jeep Commander | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Mitsubishi Galant, Mitsubishi Grandis, Mitsubishi Eclipse | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Outlander might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Jeep Grand Cherokee engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.61 m | 4.54 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.62 m | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee is larger. Jeep Grand Cherokee is 7 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Outlander, 11 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Grand Cherokee is 18 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1104 litres | 402 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2047 litres | 1691 litres | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has more luggage capacity. Jeep Grand Cherokee has 702 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Outlander. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Grand Cherokee (by 356 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Grand Cherokee is 0.5 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Outlander, which means Jeep Grand Cherokee can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`495 | 2`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 3400 | 3200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.4/10 | 7.9/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
|
Mitsubishi Outlander has
| |