Jeep Grand Cherokee 2006 vs Jeep Commander 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 6.1 Petrol | 5.7 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 425 HP | 326 HP | |
| Torque: | 570 NM | 500 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5 seconds | 7.4 seconds | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee is more dynamic to drive. Jeep Grand Cherokee engine produces 99 HP more power than Jeep Commander, whereas torque is 70 NM more than Jeep Commander. Thanks to more power Jeep Grand Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 16.4 | 15.5 | |
| Jeep Grand Cherokee consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Commander, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Grand Cherokee could require 135 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 78 litres | 78 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 470 km in combined cycle | 500 km in combined cycle | |
| 610 km on highway | 590 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 520'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 4 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Chrysler 300C | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Jeep Grand Cherokee, Chrysler 300C, Dodge Charger | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Jeep Commander might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.75 m | 4.79 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.83 m | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee is smaller. Jeep Grand Cherokee is 4 cm shorter than the Jeep Commander, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Grand Cherokee is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 978 litres | 212 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1909 litres | 1950 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Jeep Grand Cherokee has 766 litres more trunk space than the Jeep Commander. The Jeep Commander may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Commander (by 41 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Grand Cherokee is 0.6 metres less than that of the Jeep Commander, which means Jeep Grand Cherokee can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`750 | 3`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 5600 | 9400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
|
Jeep Commander has
| |