Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005 vs Nissan Murano 2002
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.7 Petrol | 3.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 326 HP | 248 HP | |
| Torque: | 500 NM | 333 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.1 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee is more dynamic to drive. Jeep Grand Cherokee engine produces 78 HP more power than Nissan Murano, whereas torque is 167 NM more than Nissan Murano. Thanks to more power Jeep Grand Cherokee reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 15.4 | 12.3 | |
|
The Nissan Murano is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Grand Cherokee consumes 3.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Murano, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Jeep Grand Cherokee could require 465 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 78 litres | 82 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 500 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
| 620 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
| Nissan Murano gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 4 years | 25 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Chrysler 300C, Dodge Charger | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Infiniti FX, Nissan Pathfinder | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Murano might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Jeep Grand Cherokee engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.75 m | 4.77 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.69 m | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee is smaller, but higher. Jeep Grand Cherokee is 2 cm shorter than the Nissan Murano, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Jeep Grand Cherokee is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 978 litres | 923 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1909 litres | 2005 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Jeep Grand Cherokee has 55 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Murano. The Nissan Murano may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Murano (by 96 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`750 | 2`295 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 5600 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
|
Nissan Murano has
| |