Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 1999
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.7 Petrol | 4.7 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 231 HP | 235 HP | |
| Torque: | 410 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.8 seconds | 9 seconds | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005 is more dynamic to drive. Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005 engine produces 4 HP less power than Jeep Grand Cherokee 1999, but torque is 10 NM more than Jeep Grand Cherokee 1999. Despite less power, Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.9 | 16.2 | |
|
The Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005 consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee 1999, which means that by driving the Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 195 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 78 litres | 78 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 520 km in combined cycle | 480 km in combined cycle | |
| 650 km on highway | 600 km on highway | ||
| Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 15 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.75 m | 4.61 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.80 m | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005 is larger, but lower. Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005 is 14 cm longer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee 1999, 1 cm wider, while the height of Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005 is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 978 litres | 1104 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1909 litres | 2047 litres | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee 1999 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005 has 126 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Grand Cherokee 1999. This could mean that the Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Jeep Grand Cherokee 1999 (by 138 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005 is 0.7 metres less than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee 1999, which means Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`750 | 2`495 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 5600 | 3400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |